
i´m quite surprised and very interested in her point of view.
in fact the hamas terrorist attacks sparked Muslim anti-Semitism riots in germany.
how is the situation in iceland?

i don't really see why you made the connection between her post and anti-semitism.REALLY?!![]()
i´m quite surprised and very interested in her point of view.
in fact the hamas terrorist attacks sparked Muslim anti-Semitism riots in germany.
how is the situation in iceland?
This is called "weaponised antisemitism". it conflates Israel's existence with Jewishness as whole and is used as a smear tactic against those who disavow Israel's war crimes (and the Western governments that fund them) in order to avoid accountability.a part of the israeli political landscape using the jewish people as a human shield to hide behind when they don't want to face criticism
There is no justification for violence ever (unless it's to remove a violent tyrant from the world).there´s no justification what hamas did to babies, women and elderlies.
i don't really see a demonization of israelis and jews in that post either though if i am honest. i see a map whose veracity i would call questionable.You CAN support the Palestinian people right for self determination without spreading lies and playing along with the demonizing of Israelis and Jews.
personally, i find what hamas has done absolutely abhorrent, but i also don't believe that it justifies what is now happening in the gaza strip. for the same reason why i found the iraq and afghanistan wars at the beginning of this century unjustified, the horror of 9/11 notwithstanding. that doesn't make me anti-american, nor anti-cristian or anti-white.there´s no justification what hamas did to babies, women and elderlies.
as a proclaimed matriarch i would rather expect her to voice her opinion on why innocent girls and women have to suffer so cruel from war, again.
There is no justification for violence ever
/this!There is no justification for violence ever
Except for every religion ever made up by men.
I also think this Is a topic people should really think before posting stuff… I’m with everyone that suffers for no reason. And I think it’s not always a bad thing if celebrities don’t post stuff about this unless it really adds anything./this!There is no justification for violence ever
Except for every religion ever made up by men.
I´m against violence too and especially when women are used for revenge like the hamas did and boys even spat on their corpses.
in berlin on the next day muslim antisemitists roamed the streets and gave out candy for free to celebrate the massacre.
this is why i think it´s insensitive to share such a (fake) picture.
This is PAC's comment on whether or not the graphic is antisemitic:The first map shows the dominant land ownership, culture and demography of the Palestinian Arabs under the British Mandate prior to the 1947 Partition Resolution. The boundaries of the country were endorsed by the League of Nations. Mandate Palestine became a geopolitical entity in June 1922. It was placed under a British administration with the express understanding that the Mandate would be of a transitional nature and lead to independence. The mandate system held until 1947.
The second map of 1947 Palestine depicts the division of the land under the Partition Plan of the General Assembly of the UN in 1947 (a division that was opposed by the country’s indigenous population, all Arab countries, Muslim countries and most of the third world members of the UN). Under this partition, 57% of the land was given to the Jewish settlers who represented by that time about one third of the population and owned some 5.66% of the land.
The third map of Palestine, 1949 to 1967, depicts the years following the partition and the war of 1948. As a consequence of the war, only 99 Palestinian Arab villages out of 674 remained intact. Several hundred of these were forcefully depopulated and destroyed (The Israeli historian Benny Morris counts 369, while the Palestinian Harvard scholar, Walid Khalidi, lists 418), or their population took refuge in safer regions. The process of destruction and expulsion was carried out according to the dictates of a pre-conceived plan known as Plan Dalet. This is why there are today millions of Palestinian refugees. The new state of Israel kept expanding into Arab areas and eventually occupied 78% of Mandate Palestine.
The fourth map, 2012 Palestine, shows that the only culturally independent Palestinian territory is Gaza and discontinuous portions of the West Bank in both of which Palestinians exercise only a limited measure of autonomy (both are under siege or the direct military control of Israel), interrupted by illegal Jewish-only Israeli “settlements” or colonies whose occupants presently number about 600,000. These colonies and the Israeli occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem were declared illegal by the International Court of Justice on July 9th, 2004. The Court called on Israel to withdraw from lands ceased in 1967, and to compensate the Palestinians for the damage and harm it has caused them. All UN member countries were called on not to recognize the Israeli occupation and to take measures to force it to evacuate the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem.
Jewish people have existed for centuries in the Middle East and specifically Palestine, as have Christians and Muslims. It's a holy land to all three groups, who are indigenous to the land. What is a specifically modern invention, as the maps show, is the state or political entity of Israel as it was established in 1948. Though Palestine previously existed as a British Mandate (and for much longer before then), it wasn't establised as a state until 1988. Similarly Iceland has always existed, yet gained independence in 1918 and was established as a republic in 1944. These are all facts that the maps attest to.The ads are directed towards the policies and practices of the government of Israel and not Jews as a group or as individuals. We do not believe that Israel is the “collective Jew” nor do we believe that individual Jews should be blamed for the policies of the government of Israel.
i really don't see what c*nts celebrating people being massacred have anything to do with björk's post. she didn't post anything in support of hamas, which was the perpetrator of those atrocities, as you pointed out yourself.
I´m against violence too and especially when women are used for revenge like the hamas did and boys even spat on their corpses.
in berlin on the next day muslim antisemitists roamed the streets and gave out candy for free to celebrate the massacre.
this is why i think it´s insensitive to share such a (fake) picture.
you nailed what i´ve tried to say with my posts, actually. :-*...No, i found it simplistic and i would have appreciated it being properly referenced...
x Users browsing this forum: No registered users